Optical electric field or voltage sensing system

ABSTRACT

An electric field sensing system is characterized so that a signal processor may derive an output representative of an electric field intended to be measured, particularly established by high voltage on a power line, with enhanced accuracy. Characterizing parameters may be derived from signals representative of a pair of light waves derived from a light wave exiting an optical electric field sensing element in a electric field sensing head spatially positioned in the high voltage environment.

RELATED APPLICATION

[0001] This application claims the benefit of priority pursuant to 35 USC 119 of provisional patent application Serial No. 60/337,820 filed Nov. 13, 2001, the disclosure of which application is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The present invention relates generally to optical sensors, and more particularly to those optical sensors that are responsive to an electric field or voltage, and systems incorporating such sensors for reliable and very accurate measurement of electric field and/or voltage.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0003] Optical technology has attracted a great deal of attention in the past few decades due to various attractive features that it offers. These features may present great advantages over other technologies used for the same applications depending on the requirements of that application. For example, optical fibers are now widely used in the telecommunication industry due to various benefits that they offer including their low loss compared to electrical cables (copper wire), which allows for long cable runs before needing to amplify or regenerate the signals (much fewer repeaters needed). Other examples are optical sensors used in harsh environmental conditions of chemical or nuclear industry. Inert glass optical fiber is a great means of transporting signal (and data) without being affected by the chemical reaction being monitored, for example.

[0004] More specifically, in the electric power industry, optical fibers provide a great deal of attractive benefits, which may include the following: immunity to electromagnetic interference, galvanic isolation of sensors at high-voltage (HV) from ground potential (safety for the workers and equipment), galvanic isolation between HV lines (safety and reliability for equipment).

[0005] Optical voltage and current sensors in the HV industry may also offer the following advantages, among others, over conventional voltage and current transducers: lighter weight—resulting in faster and easier installation, and better seismic withstanding, higher accuracy, larger dynamic range of measurement, wider bandwidth, safer insulation design due the wide separation of HV and ground, use of more environmentally friendly insulation—elimination of need for oil and/or SF₆ gas for insulation.

[0006] Prior art optical voltage sensors and systems commonly employ optical electric field sensors to measure electric field, and, of course, voltage—the potential difference or voltage establishing the electric field. Prior art optical voltage sensors and systems, for example, are taught, among many others, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,252,388, entitled, “Method and Apparatus for Measuring Voltage Using Electric Field Sensors, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,380,725, entitled, “Voltage Sensor, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Commonly, such prior art optical voltage sensing systems include a sensing head and a remote system module connected via optical fibers for transmitting and receiving optical signals to and from the sensing head. It should be appreciated that the optical high voltage sensing head is generally intended to be spatially positioned within an insulator column, although not shown or described, herein, so as to be responsive to an electric field established by the voltage difference across the column as is well understood in the art. The remote system module, including light sources, optical signal detectors, signal processors, and the like, is generally spatially positioned away from the harsh high voltage environment.

[0007] As taught in the aforementioned patents, a voltage sensor employs an optical electric field sensing element that exhibits an electro-optic effect where transit time of light wave components of differing polarizations are affected differently in response to an electric field. One form of an optical electric field sensor, herein referred to as an EFS, is a Pockels Cell type sensor, similar to that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,029,273, entitled, “Integrated Optics Pockels Cell Voltage Sensor,” the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Of course, other types of Pockels Cell type optical electric field sensing elements may be employed including, among others, bulk-optic sensors comprised of a crystalline material where differing polarization light wave components are affected differently in response to the presence of an electric field.

[0008] As indicated earlier, optical electric field sensing elements employed as part of an optical high voltage sensing head are particularly advantageous in the extreme high voltage environment. This is so, since only optical components are spatially positioned in the high voltage environment, including among others, optical fibers to route light waves into and out of the optical sensing element. In turn, optical photodetectors, signal conditioning circuitry, and signal processors to derive an output indicative of the voltage or electric field intended to be measured, are spatially positioned in the more benign electric field environment away from high voltage anomalies.

[0009] Although many improvements have been made in optical high voltage sensors and sensing systems, there remains a need for improved accuracy EFS sensing systems that have diminished sensitivities to lifetime and temperature variations in both electrical and optical system components. For example, optical component variations include those induced by ambient temperature variations, for example, variation in the power of the light source that produces the input light wave to the sensing head; and electrical component variations, for example signal conditioning amplifiers and photodetectors, before digital signal processing.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0010] An object of the invention is to provide a method and apparatus for enhancing optical voltage sensing system accuracy for lifetime and temperature induced changes in optical and electrical components of the sensing system.

[0011] In accordance with the present invention, an electric field sensing system for measuring an electric field includes a optical sensing head including (i) an optical electric field sensing element or sensor that exhibits an electro-optic effect where transit time of light waves of differing polarizations are affected differently in response to an electric field, (ii) an input optical circuit responsive to an input light wave for coupling first and second light wave components to the optical sensing element, and (iii) an output optical circuit coupled to the optical sensing element for splitting light exiting therefrom into third and fourth output light waves derived from the first and second light wave components, and directing said third and fourth light waves to impinge upon a first and second photodetectors, respectively. A signal processor derives a processor output signal, E, representative of the electric field intended to be measured as a sensing-system-specific characterized function, G_(x), mathematically described by:

E=G _(x) {a, b, E _(π), φ_(o) , K,}

[0012] where,

[0013] and b represent resultant signal processor input signals derived from the pair of photodetectors of the electric field sensing system, including both optical and electrical signal losses along the way from the output of the optical electric field sensing element,

[0014] E_(π) is a sensing system specific parameter being substantially the average electric field required to a create π radians phase shift between first and second light wave components traveling from the input to the output of the optical sensing element in response to an electric field,

[0015] φ_(o) is the intrinsic or inherent phase shift between the first and second light wave components derived from the signals a and b, and

[0016] K is equal to the ratio K_(A)/K_(B), where K_(A) and K_(B) are characteristic loss factors of the specific electric field sensing system, X, associated with said first and second processor input signals, respectively, derived from the signals a and b.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017]FIG. 1 is an exemplary embodiment of an optical electric field sensing system in accordance with the present invention.

[0018]FIG. 2 is a graphical depiction illustrating the relationship between an input electric field, E, intended to be sensed, and resulting output signals, a and b, for a sinusoidal 60 Hz signal electric field or voltage signal intended to be sensed.

[0019]FIG. 3 is a graphical depiction illustrating the transfer function of equation 4.

[0020]FIG. 4 is a graphical depiction illustrating the relationship of the residual bias, Δφ_(i), as a function of temperature for an optical electric field sensor.

[0021]FIG. 5 is a graphical depiction illustrating a plot of R described by equation 12 as a function of temperature.

[0022]FIG. 6 is a graphical depiction illustrating a plot of R as a function of Δφ_(o), combining the data from FIGS. 4 and 5, with a straight line representing a linear fit to the data.

[0023]FIG. 7 is a graphical depiction illustrating a plot of the inverse of R, namely 1/R, as a function of Δφ_(o), with a straight line representing a linear fit to the data.

[0024]FIG. 8 is a graphical depiction illustrating error in the measurement of an AC electric field intended to be measured as a function of the true Δφ_(o) residual bias.

[0025]FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary signal processor in accordance with the present invention.

[0026]FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an exemplary digital signal processor of that depicted in FIG. 9.

[0027]FIG. 11 is another block diagram of an exemplary digital signal processor of that depicted in FIG. 9 having further optional functions in accordance with the present invention.

[0028]FIG. 12 is another block diagram of an exemplary digital signal processor of that depicted in FIG. 9 arranged for providing a zero wake-up time function.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0029] Illustrated in FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of an optical electric field sensing system 100 in accordance with the present invention including (i) an optical electric field sensing head indicated by block 10, in dashed line form, and (ii) a remote system module generally indicated by block 50, in dashed line form, including optical signal source 55, a pair of optical signal photodetectors, 62, 64, and a system signal processor 800.

[0030] The optical sensing head 10 is generally spatially positioned in a high voltage environment intended to measure an electric field established by a high voltage power line (not shown). The remote system module indicated by block 50 is generally spatially located in a “lower” voltage environment away from or shielded from the high voltage anomalies associated with power lines.

[0031] The optical sensing head 10 includes an optical electric field sensing element 12 illustrated as an electro-optic crystal where the speed of light for certain polarizations differs upon application of an electric field—e.g., an electro-optic crystal. Optical sensing head 10 further includes an input optical circuit for deriving from an input optical wave, I₀, from source 55 through optical fiber 57, a pair of first and second light wave components 32 and 34, and coupling these components to an input end of the optical sensing element 12; and an output optical circuit for splitting light exiting sensing element 12 into third and fourth light waves 47, 49, and directing these light waves to travel along optical fibers 58 and 59, respectively, so as to impinge upon photodetectors 62 and 64 respectively.

[0032] The exemplary input optical circuit illustrated in FIG. 1 includes collimating lens 22 for collimating the light out of the input fiber 57, polarizer 24 to create linearly polarized light wave components 25, 27, and quarter-wave plate 26 to convert linear polarization to first and second circular polarization light wave components 32 and 34. The exemplary output optical circuit illustrated in FIG. 1 includes a polarizing beam-splitter 42 to establish third and fourth light wave components 47 and 49, which in turn are coupled to respective lenses 43 and 45, respectively, for directing light into optical fibers 58 and 59, respectively, so that light therefrom impinges upon photodetectors 62 and 64, respectively.

[0033] It should be noted that the input and output optical circuit of the sensing head maybe constructed by way of a variety of components beyond that just described so as to achieved the intended function as already described, all of which is intended to be within the true spirit and scope of the preset invention.

[0034] Light source 55, the detection unit including photodetectors 62 and 64, and the signal processor 800 are usually constructed of electronic and/or opto-electronic components, and may be integrated in one electronics module or circuit card as is well known to those skilled in the art. Optical fibers 57, 58, and 59 effectively guide light waves between block 50 and the sensing-head 10 in the high-voltage environment. Use of optical fibers provides good isolation between the high voltage environment of the optical electric field sensing head 10 and the remote environment where the remote system module 50 is intended to reside.

[0035] It should be recognized that FIG. 1 illustrates the exemplary electric field sensing application where the sensor-head 10 is in the harsh environment of a high-voltage environment. The present invention is applicable to any harsh environment where isolation between the sensing-head and the remote system module 50 is desired, e.g., a chemically active or radioactive or any other unsafe environment, where the sensor-head may survive but the remote system module would not.

[0036]FIG. 1 illustrates the particular case where the optical electric field sensing element or sensor, herein referred to as the EFS, is a Pockels cell type optical electric field/voltage sensing element. The output optical circuit derives from the output light wave components 36 and 38 exiting from the electric field sensing element 12 two complementary optical output signals L_(A) and L_(B), light wave components 47 and 49, respectively. The first optical output signal or light wave, L_(A), is the component of the sensing element 12 output that is polarized so as to be transmitted through the polarizing beam-splitter 42—polarized parallel to one axis of the polarization ellipse of the output of the electro-optic crystal as illustrated in FIG. 1. The second optical output signal or light wave, L_(B), is the component of the sensing element 12 output that is polarized so as to be reflected by the polarizing beam-splitter—polarized parallel to the other axis of the polarization ellipse of the output light. Each of these light waves are optically transmitted via optical fibers 58 and 59 from the sensor-head 10 to remote system module 50, and specifically photodetectors 62 and 64 for converting optical signals to electrical signals, “P_(a)”, and “P_(b),” for subsequent signal processing as will be further described.

[0037] Details of signal processor 800 are more particularly illustrated in the block diagram of FIG. 9. The output electrical signals P_(a), and P_(b) from photodetectors 62 and 64, respectively, are typically signal processed by signal conditioning circuitry 910 a and 910 b, respectively, that may include amplifiers, limiters, filters, and the like, for obtaining a useful signal for digitalization. In turn each output of the signal conditioning circuitry 910 a and 910 b is presented to a respective analog-to-digital converter 912 a and 912 b, respectively, having digital outputs D_(a) and D_(b), respectively.

[0038] As illustrated in FIG. 9, signal processor 800 further includes a digital signal processor 920 for processing the digital signals D_(a) and D_(b). Digital signal processor 920 may be constructed by way of a wide variety of digital signal processors including microprocessors, computer, firmware, software, and the like for achieving the intended signal processing as will now be described.

[0039] In the following exposition, at any sampling time, signal “a” is a digital value representing light intensity L_(A) after having been effected by all the losses and scale factor changes through its transmission and conversion from optical intensity to an electrical analog or digital signal value; i.e., a=K_(A)×L_(A). Similarly, b=K_(B)×L_(B.)In accordance with the present invention, signal representations “a” and “b” are the resultant signals or measurements represented by D_(a) and D_(b), respectively, operated on by digital signal processor 920 in order to determine the electric field or voltage intended to be measured.

[0040] A transfer function of the optical electric field sensing system employing a Pockels cell EFS, hereafter referred to as the EFS sensing system, may be $\begin{matrix} {a = {\frac{P_{0}K_{A}}{2}\left\lbrack {1 + {\alpha \quad {\cos \left( {\frac{\pi \quad E}{E_{\pi}} + \phi_{0}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack}} & \left( \text{1.a} \right) \\ {b = {\frac{P_{0}K_{B}}{2}\left\lbrack {1 - {\alpha \quad {\cos \left( {\frac{\pi \quad E}{E_{\pi}} + \phi_{0}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack}} & \left( \text{1.b} \right) \end{matrix}$

[0041] where,

[0042] a and b represent resultant signals derived from the photodetector output signals (D_(a) and D_(b))of the electric field sensing system, including both optical and electrical signal losses along the way from the output of the optical electric field sensing element,

[0043] P_(o) is the total optical power intensity of the input wave O₀ entering the sensor-head,

[0044] E is the electric field along the length of the electro-optic crystal or the average electric field over the chosen sensor length,

[0045] E_(π) is the (average) electric field required to create radians phase shift between orthogonal optical polarization components traveling in the electro-optic crystal (32, 34),

[0046] φ₀ is the bias or intrinsic phase shift between the optical polarization components traveling in the electro-optic crystal (mostly controlled by the quarter-wave plate in the embodiment shown in FIG. 1), α is a number between 0 and 1 (very close to 1 for a good EFS), and

[0047] K_(A) and K_(B) are the loss factors for signals a and b, respectively.

[0048] E_(π)is basically a measure of the sensitivity of the EFS and is dependent on many physical and geometrical parameters such as optical wavelength, the electro-optic coefficients of the electro-optic crystal, its refractive index, and many other parameters. For a comprehensive discussion on electro-optic phase modulation and sensors, reference is hereby made to T. Tamir (Ed.), entitled, “Guided-Wave Optoelectronics”, 2 ^(nd) Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1990, and A. Yariv, and P. Yeh, entitled, “Optical Waves in Crystals”, John Wiley & Sons, 1984, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

[0049] The value of α, a measure of the goodness of the EFS within the sensor head, is usually less than 1.0, the value for an ideal EFS. However, the value of α is more typically slightly less than 1.0, e.g., 0.99, due to practical limitations in manufacturing an EFS, e.g., misalignment of the optical components in the sensor-head.

[0050] The value of φ_(o), a measure of the bias or initial phase shift between the two optical polarization components traveling in the electro-optic crystal, is mostly determined by the quarter-wave plate which is typically designed so that φ_(o) is close to π/2 radians or odd multiples thereof. In these circumstances, the optical electric field sensing system transfer function of equations 1.a and 1.b may be rewritten as follows: $\begin{matrix} {a = {\frac{P_{0}K_{A}}{2}\left\lbrack {1 + {\alpha \quad {\sin \left( {\frac{\pi \quad E}{E_{\pi}} + {\Delta \quad \phi_{0}}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack}} & \left( \text{2.a} \right) \\ {b = {\frac{P_{0}K_{B}}{2}\left\lbrack {1 - {\alpha \quad {\sin \left( {\frac{\pi \quad E}{E_{\pi}} + {\Delta \quad \phi_{0}}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack}} & \left( \text{2.b} \right) \end{matrix}$

[0051] where,

[0052] Δφ_(o)φ_(o)−π/2 the residual bias of the EFS.

[0053] Commonly, a Pockels cell EFS system uses only one of the two output components, a or b, as illustrated in FIG. 1, and mathematically described by the. sensing system transfer function equation pairs 1 and 2. FIG. 2 is a graphical depiction illustrating the relationship between an input electric field, E, intended to be sensed, and resulting output signals, a, and b, for a sinusoidal 60 Hz signal:

E=E ₀sin (φt)  (3)

[0054] Where,

[0055] E_(o) is the amplitude of the input electric field,

[0056] φ is the angular frequency, where φ=2πf,

[0057] t is time, and

[0058] f is the frequency of the electric field, here 60 Hz.

[0059] The purpose of signal processor 800 is to accurately determine a value E representative of the electric field intended to be measured using resultant signals a and/or b, in accordance with some form of a predetermined sensor transfer function. It is important to note that signals a, b, and various parameters of the transfer function of the EFS system may change due to changes in various parameters such as temperature, change of intensity of the input light source, P₀, and vibration, and the like. In accordance with the present invention, the optical electric field sensing system and its associated signal processor 800 provide an accurate sensor electric field measurement “E” by taking into consideration the aforesaid effect of changing parameters that may affect the overall transfer function of the EFS sensing system.

[0060] One parameter, the input light intensity, P₀, may vary or fluctuate due to vibration, aging of the light source, or other causes. In accordance with the present invention, the effect of variation in the input light intensity, P₀, on the resultant measurement of E may be diminished by “normalizing” the EFS sensing system output signals, a and/or b, so that resultant sensor system output value E may be derived such that it will not be sensitive to optical light intensity or power fluctuations. Using equations (2.a) and (2.b), a “normalized transfer function” may be derived by dividing the EFS sensing system signal outputs a by (a+Kb), where K=K_(A)/K_(B) as follows: $\begin{matrix} {S_{A} = {\frac{a}{a + {Kb}} = {\frac{1}{2}\left\lbrack {1 + {{\alpha sin}\left( {\frac{\pi \quad E}{E_{\pi}} + {\Delta \quad \phi_{0}}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

[0061] It should be noted that other forms of the transfer function (4) are of course possible that may be employed that are effectively equivalent to that mathematically expressed in equation (4) for purposes of enhance accuracy of the measurement of E as described herein. For example, the expression just above may be replace by $\begin{matrix} {S_{A}^{\prime} = \frac{a - {Kb}}{a + {Kb}}} & \left( \text{4b} \right) \end{matrix}$

[0062] Even though S′_(A) may have the benefit of better signal-to-noise ratio compared to S_(A), the matters disclosed in this invention equally apply whether S_(A) or S′_(A), or the like, are used.

[0063] Also illustrated in FIG. 2 is a graphical depiction of S_(A) as a function of time for the given electric field E, resultant sensor output signals a, b, and ratio K, where, P₀=1.0, K_(A)=0.9, K_(B)=0.81, K=1.111, α=0.90, Δφ_(o) , πE/E _(π)=0.01.

[0064]FIG. 3 illustrates a graphical depiction of a plot of the transfer function (4) with for an example set of EFS sensing system parameters as just recited. The most linear portion of the transfer function is generally indicated by the dashed rectangle.

[0065] The inverse transfer function is mathematically expressed as: $\begin{matrix} {E = {\frac{E_{\pi}}{\pi}\left\lbrack {{{- \Delta}\quad \phi_{0}} + {{Arcsin}\left\lbrack {\left( \frac{2}{\alpha} \right)*\left( {\frac{a}{a + {Kb}} - 0.5} \right)} \right\rbrack}} \right.}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

[0066] Assuming the values of sensing system specific parameters α, K, Δφ_(o), and E_(π) are known, the value of the electric field may be calculated as a function of resultant signals a and b using equation (5) by way of signal processor 800. A specific electric field sensing system, X, may be characterize, in part, by empirically determining sensor system parameter values for α and E_(π). For example, the values of α and E_(π) (or other values effectively equivalent to these two characterizing parameters) may be measured by calibrating the specific EFS sensing system under known electric fields before using the EFS sensing system to measure unknown electric fields. The parameter “K” depends on all of the optical and electrical losses in the signal path for signals “a” and “b” and may be measured and/or controlled for a particular EFS sensing system as will be further described. The residual bias parameter of the EFS sensing system, Δφ_(o), depends on the actual bias, and, in accordance with the present invention, may also be measured and/or controlled.

[0067] The electric field intended to be measured may be expressed in the form given by equation (3) given the assumption that the electric field is dominantly a simple sinusoidal alternating signal, as is typically the case in electric power systems. Accordingly, the parameter K may be determined using equations (2) and (3). The parameter K is equal to peak-to-peak value (or some AC rms value) of sensor signal “a” divided by the peak-to-peak (or similar AC rms) value of sensor signal “b”: $\begin{matrix} {K = {\frac{K_{A}}{K_{B}} = \frac{A_{AC}}{B_{AC}}}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

[0068] where A_(AC) and B_(AC) are proportional to the absolute value of the magnitude (e.g., root-mean-square, peak-to-peak, or amplitude, or the like) of the alternating components of sensor signals a and b. For example, for a value of residual bias Δφ_(o) close to zero, and for E much smaller than E_(π) (a very typical and practical case), one may write:

a=A _(DC) +a _(AC)

b=B _(DC) +b _(AC)

[0069] or

a≈A _(DC) +A _(AC)sin(φt)  (7.a)

b≈B _(DC) −B _(AC)sin(φt)  (7.b)

[0070] where,

[0071] A_(DC) and B_(DC) are the DC or average values of sensor signals a and b, and

[0072] A_(AC) and B_(AC) are the amplitude of the alternating signal components of sensor signals a and b.

[0073] Calculating K in this manner is essentially made possible by a key property of the Pockels cell EFS: Namely, any light that is not guided to channel A is guided to channel B, i.e., ideally A_(AC)=B_(AC) which essentially is the basis of operation of the Pockels cell shown in FIG. 1. In practice, the two sensor signal output components will experience different losses and gains in their optical paths and in their electronic signal paths such that A_(AC)=K×B_(AC).

[0074] Once K is calculated using equations (6) and (7) above, one may dynamically calculate Δφ_(o) using the mathematical expression of equations (3) and (5): $\begin{matrix} {{E_{0}{\sin \left( {\omega \quad t} \right)}} = {\frac{E_{\pi}}{\pi}\left\lbrack {{{- \Delta}\quad \phi_{0}} + {{Arcsin}\left\lbrack {\left( \frac{2}{\alpha} \right)*\left( {\frac{a}{a + {Kb}} - 0.5} \right)} \right\rbrack}} \right.}} & (8) \end{matrix}$

[0075] The average value of equation (8) over time is equal to zero, hence: $\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \quad \phi_{0}} = {{Average}\left\{ {{Arc}\quad {\sin \left\lbrack {\left( \frac{2}{\alpha} \right)\left( {\frac{a}{a + {Kb}} - 0.5} \right)} \right\rbrack}} \right\}}} & (9) \end{matrix}$

[0076] Accordingly, for an alternating current signal, the parameters K and Δφ_(o) may be dynamically measured and adjusted. Note that the parameters K and Δφ_(o) may and probably will change over time as functions of various other parameters. For example, in an electric field sensor head, the parameter Δφ_(o) may change as a function of the temperature, particularly that of the quarter-wave plate 26 of the input optical circuit illustrated in the embodiment shown in FIG. 1. Further, the parameter “K” may change due to drift in the gain of a photo-detector in the detection unit over time. However, these changes are relatively slow.

[0077] In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention particularly illustrated in FIG. 10, signal processor 800, specifically digital signal processor 920, is operative for periodically updating the characterizing parameters, K and Δφ_(o), i.e., periodically calculating new values for parameters K and Δφ_(o), and also tracking their values over time. For example, temperature may change at a rate of 20 Kelvin/hour, and temperature dependence of Δφ_(o) may be ˜0.001 radian/Kelvin, resulting in 0.02 radian/hour change in Δφ_(o). Parameters K and Δφ_(o) may be calculated every 10 seconds, for example, allowing for better than 0.02/360=0.000056 radian accuracy in knowing Δφ_(o) at any time. In summary, if any changes in K and/or Δφ_(o) are measured accurately, and therefore, K and Δφ_(o) are always well known, then they will not contribute to any significant error in use of equation (5) or (8) for determining electric field E intended to be measured.

[0078] Furthermore, the ability to measure the parameters K and Δφ_(o) dynamically or frequently, allows for building highly accurate sensors that are relatively immune to temperature or light intensity fluctuations. For example, if over time (e.g., days), an amplifier that amplifies the signal received on a photo-detector (where L_(B) is measured) has a gain change due to some thermal effect, i.e., K_(B) is changed, calculating and adjusting K frequently will eliminate the possibility of introducing an error in the electric field measurement when the inverse transfer function, equation (5) is used.

Temperature Sensor

[0079] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention particularly illustrated in FIG. 11, tracking the parameter Δφ_(o) permits the electric field sensor to be also used as a temperature sensor. The EFS sensing system may be characterized over temperature, in a test chamber for example, so that the relationship between its bias, or residual bias, Δφ_(o), and temperature is well characterized. This is particularly illustrated in FIG. 10 by way of a look-up table indicated by block 987. Then the measurement of bias may be used to measure and/or estimate the ambient temperature at the sensor-head spatial location, thereby serving, in part, as a sensing head, and more particularly a high voltage insulator column temperature sensor.

[0080]FIG. 4 graphically depicts the relationship of the residual bias, Δφ_(o), as a function of temperature for an EFS. Knowledge of temperature may be used for many applications, including compensating for temperature dependence of the sensitivity of the EFS itself. In a simplified form, the sensitivity of the EFS is mainly given by the value E_(π) in equations (1), (2), (4), (5) and (8) above. E_(π) may be determined using equation (8) where all other sensor parameters and E_(o) are already known. Equation (5) may be rewritten as: $\begin{matrix} {Y = {{\frac{\pi \quad E}{E_{\pi}} + {\Delta \quad \phi_{0}}} = {{Arc}\quad {\sin \left\lbrack {\left( \frac{2}{\alpha} \right)*\left( {\frac{a}{a + {Kb}} - 0.5} \right)} \right\rbrack}}}} & (10) \end{matrix}$

[0081] Using equations (3) and (10), the amplitude of the AC portion of Y divided by E_(o), i.e., Y_(AC)/E_(o), will be inversely proportional to E_(π) and may be used as a measure of the sensitivity of the sensor. The DC portion of Y is practically equal to Δφ_(o) (for E/E_(π) much smaller than 1).

[0082] Accordingly, an electric field sensor may be characterized in the following exemplary manner. Consider, for example, applying a voltage V across a pair of electrodes, which are separated at a constant distance, to create an electric field E between them in spatial proximity to an EFS sensor within a test chamber. For an applied sinusoidal voltage between the terminals, the voltage across the terminal may be expressed as:

V=V _(o)sin(φt+δ)=C E _(o)sin(φt)  , (11)

[0083] where the parameters C and δ depend on the geometry and the properties of the materials in this environment, including the EFS sensor itself.

[0084] If we define R as:

R≡Y _(AC) /V _(o),  (12)

[0085] the value of the parameter R may be used as a measure of the sensitivity of the EFS.

[0086] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the EFS may be characterized in terms of the parameter values “R” and Δφ_(o) as a function of temperature. These parameters may be stored and utilize by the signal processor 800, and more specifically by calculation block 950 of digital signal processor 920 illustrated in FIG. 10, in order to compensate for EFS sensing system output signals for temperature variations in the sensitivity of the EFS.

[0087] The signal processor 800, in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, is configured for re-calculating Δφ_(o) frequently (as explained above) as particularly illustrated with reference to digital signal processor 920 illustrated in FIG. 10. Using the stored characterization information of the EFS sensing system, the temperature of the EFS may be calculated (or looked up) from Δφ_(o); and again, using the stored characterization information, the sensitivity adjustment factor for the EFS at that temperature may be looked up (or calculated).

[0088] Alternatively, instead of going through a two-step process, from Δφ_(o) to temperature, and from temperature to R, a single-step process may employed going directly from Δφ_(o) to R. The relationship between Δφ_(o) and R may be obtained through sensor sensing system characterization, and may, for example, be stored as a look up table or as a predetermined function of Δφ_(o) calculated by way of signal processor 800.

[0089]FIG. 5 graphically depicts a plot of R as a function of temperature for the same sensor of FIG. 4. FIG. 6 graphically depicts a plot of R as a function Δφ_(o), combining the data from FIGS. 4 and 5. FIG. 7 graphically depicts a plot of the inverse of R, namely 1/R, as a function of Δφ_(o), that may be stored in the processing unit and be used for compensating the temperature dependent sensitivity variation of the EFS. In summary, using the above techniques, a “self temperature compensated” electric field sensor system may be obtained.

EFS Sensing System Condition Alarms

[0090] Another advantage of measuring and updating parameters K and Δφ_(o) frequently is that the measured values may be used for monitoring the EFS sensing system, and alarming against any unusual conditions; i.e., allow for and improve “self monitoring” of the EFS sensing system. This aspect of the present invention is particularly illustrated in FIG. 11 where digital signal processor 920 is configured to include parameter monitoring indicated by block 970 and a designated alarm indicator or function indicated by block 972 responsive to system monitoring block 970. As indicated earlier, functions such as these and others may be accomplished by way of hardware, software, firmware, and the like, the details of which are well within the skill of the artisan and not described herein.

[0091] For one exemplary alarm function, if K becomes significantly larger than 1 (e.g. K˜10), it could mean that the sensor “b” signal is becoming very weak. Perhaps some optical connector in the path of that signal is degrading, or a photo-detector in the path of that signal is failing.

[0092] Another exemplary alarm function is that if the residual bias is a value out of the expected range for all possible temperature conditions, see FIG. 4 for example, then the EFS sensor system may yield an alarm indicating that there is some problem in the EFS sensing system. For example, if at the installation of the EFS sensing system, the output fibers that are supposed to be connected to channel A and channel B photo-detectors are reversed by mistake, the measured bias will be different (typically reversed sign); e.g., for the EFS depicted in FIG. 4, instead of Δφ_(o) being a value between 0.01 and 0.2 radians, it will be a value between −0.01 and −0.2. In summary, many “self monitoring” features for the EFS sensing system may be implemented and/or enhanced using these principles of the present invention.

[0093] The method taught above for measuring EFS sensing system parameters K and Δφ_(o) uses the presence of an AC electric field at the location of the sensor to calculate K and Δφ_(o) accurately and frequently in order to maintain accurate electric field measurement. If the AC electric field is interrupted or distorted for a while, the accuracy of the system is typically still maintained since the values of K and Δφ_(o) don't typically change rapidly. Of course, some additional logic and/or processing may be required in order to make sure wrong values do not get calculated.

[0094] For example, a logic rule may be as follows: if the values of A_(AC) and/or B_(AC) (see equation (7)) are less than certain minimum values, it should be interpreted as having no or low electric field at the location of the sensor and K should not be updated using these low and, perhaps, inaccurate values—thus avoiding an incorrect determination of the value of K and subsequent electric field measurements.

Zero Wake-Up Time Feature

[0095] In another scenario, when powering up a sensor system that uses electronics, for example, after any major service of the system, there will be some delay time required (perhaps several seconds or minutes) for the electronics to boot up and warm up to equilibrium. This time is referred to as “warm-up” time. Further, when any sensor system is used for measuring electric field, voltage, or current, of a power transmission line, there may be a time delay between the energization of the power transmission line and the time when the output of the sensor is valid. This time delay is referred to as “wake-up” time.

[0096] It should be noted however that wake-up time should not be confused with “warm-up” time. Warm up time has to do with the “energization of the electronics part of the sensor system”. The wake-up time is the time it takes from “the presence of the parameter to be measured (e.g., HV related electric field) until it is correctly measured and presented.” The warm-up time may be several minutes without causing any inconvenience in a permanent installation. However, the wake up time is typically expected to be very low, depending on the application.

[0097] The electric field sensors described herein may be used for measuring voltage on HV transmission lines. The voltage may need to be known for various applications including protection and metering applications. For metering applications the accuracy required is typically much more stringent, however a wake-up time of several seconds may be tolerated. For example, if the electric power to be measured needs to be accurate with an uncertainty less than 0.2% for the monthly electricity bill (revenue metering application), >0.2% inaccuracy, or even total loss of data, over one minute will not affect the monthly bill significantly (one month is approximately 60×24×30=43200 minutes).

[0098] For a protection application, however, a very low wake-up time is required. Typically, a fault needs to be cleared in several milli-seconds after it appears on the power transmission line. Some faults may happen exactly when the transmission line is energized. In these cases, the wake-up time, for protection applications, needs to be very short, ideally zero. On the other hand, the accuracy requirement for protection applications is not as stringent, for example, the International Standard—Instrument Transformers—Part2, IEC 60044-2, specifies a class 3P protection voltage sensor that may have an uncertainty of up to 3% in its measurement. The techniques explained herein for continuous measurement and monitoring of K and Δφ_(o) imply that the wake-up time of the sensor is not zero.

[0099] The following exposition describes a technique used to achieve a “zero wake-up time” EFS sensing system of the type explained above so that one sensor may satisfy all the needs of both metering (accurate but slow) and protection (not so accurate but fast) applications.

[0100] The zero wake-up time function is particularly illustrated in the combination block and flow diagram of FIG. 12 which depicts another functional arrangement for digital signal processor 920. The scheme employed in accordance with the present invention may be described as follows: the signal processor 800, as indicated in FIG. 1, may implement a start up routine 955 which uses the DC values of the resultant signals a and b, A_(DC) and B_(DC), respectively, see equations (6) and (7), and the characterization data, see FIGS. 4 to 7, to estimate bias (or residual bias) first, then K may be calculated from bias and A_(DC) and B_(DC) in the absence of electric field (E=0) using equations (2) or (9) and (7): $\begin{matrix} {K = {\frac{A_{DC}}{B_{DC}} \times \frac{\left( {1 - {\alpha \quad {\sin \left( {\Delta \quad \phi_{0}} \right)}}} \right.}{\left( {1 + {\alpha \quad \sin \quad \left( {\Delta \quad \phi_{0}} \right)}} \right.}}} & (13) \end{matrix}$

[0101] The goal is to calculate the EFS sensing system parameters K and Δφ_(o) just accurately enough so that the errors in E associated with inaccuracies in K and Δφ_(o) when using the inverse transfer function of equation (5) to measure E are sufficiently low for a protection application.

[0102] So, for the protection application, a wake-up time of zero may be achieved in this manner. During the first few seconds after the AC voltage becomes present on the HV transmission line, K and Δφ_(o) are recalculated more precisely, as described previously, and higher accuracy appropriate for metering is achieved. In other words, the wake-up time of the EFS sensing system for protection level accuracy is zero (where it matters), but the wake-up time for metering level accuracy is several seconds (where it does not cause any problems).

[0103] Using a specific example to show the “zero wake-up time” technique, assume an EFS sensing system having performance as depicted in FIGS. 4 to 7, and that the sensor system needs to be used for both metering and protection applications. For the metering application, it is expected to meet IEC 60044-7 class 0.5 accuracy. Class 0.5 requires that the uncertainty or error in the amplitude of the AC signal measured by the sensor to be less than 0.5%. For the protection application, the sensor is expected to meet IEC 60044-7 standard class 6P. Class 6P requires that the uncertainty or error in the amplitude of the AC signal measured by the sensor to be less than 6%.

[0104]FIG. 5 shows that if the EFS sensor is not compensated, the sensitivity of the electric field sensor, R, may vary by about ˜5% (from 1.70 to 1.78). So, if R is assume to be 1.74 at all time, it (inaccurate R or E_(π)) will contribute between −2.5% and +2.5% error to the value of E calculated using the inverse transfer function of equation (5). It leaves between −3.5% and +3.5% allowance for error contribution from inaccuracies in K and Δφ_(o).

[0105]FIG. 5, shows that the residual bias of the sensor will be between 0 and 0.2 radians. If we assume the residual bias is 0.15 (Δφ_(oRef)=0.15), K may be calculated using equation (13) and the average values of sensor signals a and b, A_(DC) and B_(DC), respectively: $\begin{matrix} {K_{initial} = {\frac{A_{DC}}{B_{DC}} \times \frac{\left( {1 - {\alpha \quad {\sin \left( {\Delta \quad \phi_{0{Ref}}} \right)}}} \right.}{\left( {1 + {\alpha \quad {\sin \left( {\Delta \quad \phi_{0{Ref}}} \right)}}} \right.}}} & (14) \end{matrix}$

[0106]FIG. 8 shows the error in the measurement of AC electric field performed by the EFS sensing system as a function of the true Δφ_(o), when a value of Δφ_(oRef)=0.15 is used as explained in the previous paragraph.

[0107]FIG. 8 shows that the error in calculating electric field due to incorrect K and Δφ_(o), for all possible values of Δφ_(o) (between 0 and 0.2 radian here) is less than 1%. For values E_(o)/E_(π) much less than one (e.g., <0.03 is a common and practical case), the error in measured electric field E_(o) shown in FIG. 8 is proportional to the error in the slope of the transfer function assumed (error in slope ˜[cos(Δφ_(oRef))/cos(Δφ_(o))−1], see equation (4)).

[0108] The “zero wake-up time” technique, exemplified above, uses the characteristic of the slope of the transfer function of the EFS sensing system to achieve moderate accuracy at start-up. For values of Δφ_(o) close to zero at all practical temperatures of interest, e.g., Δφ_(o) between −0.2 and 0.2 radian, which is a very easy and practical case, the transfer function (see FIG. 3, or equations (4) and (5)) is quite linear with a relatively constant slope. Using incorrect bias and using DC values of sensor signals a and b may contribute some error to calculating K, but use of inaccurate K calculated in this manner does not result in unacceptably inaccurate AC electric field measurement (see FIG. 8). Effectively, since the “wrong” K is based on a “wrong” Δφ_(o), they mostly cancel the effect of each other. While, this method may be used to achieve 6% accuracy upon HV start up for a protection application, after the presence of AC signal on the HV line for a while, e.g., 10 seconds, accurate K and Δφ_(o) may be calculated as explained in the earlier sections of this document to achieve better than 0.5% uncertainty required for metering in the example given above.

[0109] A simple procedure for choosing Δφ_(oRef) to be used in the zero-wake-up-time routine above may be given as follows:

[0110] If the residual bias, Δφ_(o), over the temperature range of interest changes between two extremes, one may find the maximum and minimum values of cos(Δφ_(o)), cos_(max)(Δφ_(o)) and cos_(min)(Δφ_(o)), respectively, and use

Δφ_(oRef)=±Arccos{[cos_(max)(Δφ_(o))+cos_(min)(Δφ_(o))]/2}  (15)

[0111] The choice of + or − sign depends on the typical value of Δφ_(o) over the temperature range of interest for the particular sensor being used. If Δφ_(o) is typically positive, then positive is recommended to be used; if Δφ_(o) is typically negative, then negative sign is recommended to be used; nevertheless, either will work.

[0112] Moreover, if the temperature of the sensor is known accurately, the Δφ_(o) versus temperature characterization table of the sensor, as graphically depicted in FIG. 4, may be used to estimate Δφ_(oRef) very accurately so that it is very close to true value of Δφ_(o). In this case, a wake-up time of zero may be achieved while guaranteeing much higher accuracy (e.g., metering accuracy class 0.2% of IEC 60044-7). If the temperature is not accurately known, but may be estimated with some error bounds, e.g., ±10° C., the Δφ_(o) versus temperature characterization table may be divided into a few regions, e.g., 6 regions of 20° C. span to cover 120° C. temperature variation, and then the zero-wake-up-time routine given above may be used within each region (i.e., one Δφ_(oRef) calculated using equation (15) for each region) to guarantee more accurate measurement of electric field at HV energization time.

[0113] For example, for the EFS depicted in FIG. 4, the operating range may be divided into 7 segments, each covering say, ˜20° C., while the contribution of the zero-wake-up-time algorithm given above to error in electric field measurement is less than 0.15%, and contribution of temperature sensitivity of the sensor (see FIG. 5) is less than 0.35%, resulting in maintaining uncertainty less than 0.5% in measuring electric field (or voltage) as soon as AC voltage is applied to the HV line (zero wake-up time).

[0114] The techniques given above may be used for other devices and sensors that have transfer functions of the form substantially given by equations (1) and (2). An example of that is the integrated optics Pockels cell described in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,029,273, issued to Jaeger, and further described in the following paper by Jaeger and Rahmatian: “Integrated Optics Pockels Cell High-Voltage Sensor,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 10, No. 1, January 1995, pp. 127-134, herein incorporated by reference hereto.

[0115] In the explanations above, e.g., on self-temperature-compensating electric field sensor, the concepts of correction and compensation were explained using the amplitude of the AC signal as the parameter of interest. Obviously, the same techniques may be used to characterize and correct for other parameters such as the phase of the AC voltage to be measured, e.g., 6 as particularly described in equation (11).

[0116] Illustrated in FIG. 10 is an exemplary combination flow and block diagram for the digital signal processor 920 illustrating particular functions as mathematically described above. As before, digital signal processor 920 receives digital input signals D_(a) and D_(b). From these signals, values of K and Δφ_(o) may be calculated in accordance with equations 6 and 9, as designated by blocks 930 and 932 respectively. In turn these values may be stored as indicated by blocks 940 and 942. Calculation block 950 is operative for calculation of the value E representative of the electric field intended to be measured as a function of the input signals D_(a) and D_(b), and the determined values of K and Δφ_(o).

[0117] As illustrated in the exemplary combination flow and block diagram of FIG. 10, values of K and Δφ_(o) may be periodically calculated or updated in accordance with a preselected update time as generally indicated by blocks 960 and 962, for generating a sampling signal as inputs to blocks 940 and 942.

[0118] As illustrated in the exemplary combination flow and block diagram of FIG. 11, values of K and Δφ_(o) may be monitored as indicated by block 970 including comparators for generating an alarm signal input to alarm indicating block 972. For example, the value of K may be monitored and/or tracked to indicate for example the losses in the optical-electrical circuitry are beyond acceptable range or non-existent indicating a fault, or that other catastrophic or performance characteristics as indicated by values of Δφ_(o) as aforesaid.

[0119] As is also indicated in FIG. 11, the value of Δφ_(o) may be signal processed to provide an output signal indicative of the temperature of the sensing-head as indicated by block 985 which also may be monitored for indicating a system fault in the high voltage environment, or other functions.

[0120] It should be noted that the input and output optical circuits of the sensing head may be alternatively arranged to achieve the same intended function. For example, quarter-wave palte 26 may alternatively place at the output of the sensor 12 in order to obtain optical output light waves 47 and 49.

[0121] It should alo e recognized that signal processor 800 including signal conditioning may be constructed from a combination of both digital an analog circuits as desired, all of which are within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

[0122] While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the accompanying figures, it will be understood, however, that other modifications thereto are of course possible, all of which are intended to be within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

[0123] Again, it should be noted that other transfer functions may be employed beyond those mathematically expressed by equations 4 and 4, all of which are intended to be within the true spirit and scope of the present invention as already indicated.

[0124] More specifically, it should be recognized by those skilled in the art that the electric field sensing head may take on the form of a wide variety sensor known or to become available that may be selected to achieve the same intended function as described herein, all of which are intended to be within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Further, the present invention may employ a sensing head intended for sensing a different measureand, but which affects the transit time of light wave components of differing polarization, and is also intended to be within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

[0125] Lastly, specific exemplary mathematical expressions have been set forth herein, however, other such expression are intended to be within the true spirit and scope of the present invention where parameter values related to the values of K and the residual bias are obtained, along with signals indicative of the pair of output light wave from the optical sensing element are processed. 

We claim:
 1. An optical electric field sensing system for measuring an electric field comprising: a light source for generating a light wave having finite intensity; first and second photodetectors for providing first and second electrical detector output signals, respectively, in response to any light impinging thereon, respectively; an electric field optical sensing head having, an optical sensing element that exhibits an electro-optic effect where transit time of light waves of differing polarizations are affected differently in response to an electric field; an input optical circuit responsive to said light wave for coupling first and second light wave components to said optical sensing element, where said first and second light wave components are of differing polarization and an output optical circuit coupled to said optical sensing element for splitting light exiting therefrom into third and fourth output light waves derived from said first and second light wave components, and directing said third and fourth light waves to impinge upon said first and second photodetectors, respectively; and a signal processor for deriving a processor output signal, E, representative of the electric field intended to be measured as a sensing system specific, X, characterized function, G_(x), mathematically described by: E=G _(x) {a, b, E _(π), φ_(o) , K, α} where, a and b represent resultant signal processor input signals derived from the photodetector output signals of the electric field sensing system, including both optical and electrical signal losses along the way from the output of the optical sensing element, E_(π) is a sensing system specific parameter being substantially the average electric field required to create a π radian phase shift between optical polarization components traveling from the input to the output of said optical sensing element in response to an electric field, Δφ_(o) is the intrinsic phase shift between the first and second light wave components, α is a number between 0 and 1 that characterizes the goodness of the specific electric field sensing system, X, and K is equal to the ratio K_(A)/K_(B), where K_(A) and K_(B) are characteristic loss factors of the specific electric field sensing system, X, associated with said first and second processor input signals, respectively. 